Notice To Broker Was Not
Notice To Insurance Company
General Liability |
Errors & Omissions |
Professional |
Conditions |
A
member of a church congregation allegedly fell and was injured on the church
premises following a funeral service. At the pastor's request, a church
official telephoned the office of the church's insurance broker the following
morning and, according to her testimony, was told by an employee of the broker
that the church's general liability insurer would be notified.
The
church received a letter nine months later from the injured person's attorney,
threatening a lawsuit. It was given to the broker, who promptly sent a written
notice of claim to the insurance company's agent. Having had no prior knowledge
of the accident, the insurer denied coverage because of late notice based on a
policy requirement that the insured give written notice of an accident as soon
as practicable.
The
insurance company brought a declaratory judgment action to determine the rights
of the parties. It appealed from a judgment declaring that it must defend and
indemnify the church. Though the trial court found that the church had not
proved an agency relationship between its broker and the insurance company, it
concluded that the circumstances justified the late providing of written notice
to the insurer. It was noted that there was a sticker on the face of the policy
informing the insured to notify the broker "in case of loss."
The
appeal court concluded that "....the broker is deemed to be the agent of
the insured, and notice to the broker cannot be
treated as notice to the insurer." It said the church had not proved an
agency relationship between its broker and the insurer. The insurer did not
authorize the broker's loss notice sticker on the policy nor any change in the
loss notice requirements spelled out in the policy.
The
trial court's judgment was reversed in favor of the insurance company and
against the insured church.
Agway
Insurance Companies, Respondent, Appellant, v. Williamson ET AL., Appellants; Knight
Agency, Inc., Appellant, Respondent. New York Supreme Court, Appellate
Division, Fourth Department. June 22, 1990. 557 N.Y.S.2d 193. CCH 1990 Fire and
Casualty Cases, Paragraph 2742.